Winston Churchill in the fields of one of his speeches, wrote: "The argument is weak, it is necessary to strengthen the voice." That's exactly it deals with British diplomacy. The fact that all persons involved in the Litvinenko case were in the field of view of British intelligence, to put it mildly, undermine the notorious evidence gathered by British police. The question of how can the police from Scotland Yard to work on clearing intelligence – this is a philosophical question. A case of Litvinenko, a hefty information sabotage against the Russian government threatened to strike at its authors. The arguments are weak, we must strengthen the voice.
David Miliband, British Foreign Minister: "In a letter to the deputy prosecutor general said Russia that the current Russian Constitution forbids extradition. The Russian authorities have not shown any signs of willingness to work with us to resolve this issue. The situation is not unique. For example, some countries have recently been amended in its Constitution to conform with European law. "
– And this is paranoia. British minister hints at Germany. We somehow have a relation to your European legislation? Most importantly, how does it apply to Britain itself, in which, incidentally, no Constitution, no at all? What the British did not give anyone from birth to us 200 years, including revolutionaries, terrorists, murderers, thugs and thieves, it would be God to them, the reputation of the terrorists safe haven in Britain international.
Q: In 2002, London has refused to extradite an Algerian Firaisi Laud, whom U.S. authorities accuse of involvement in the September 11 attacks. For 10 years, British authorities refused to issue a French Algerian terrorist Rashid Ramdy, received in the UK refugee status. The Italians sought unsuccessfully for three years from the issuance of London Fudge Hassan Faraj, suspected of belonging to an international criminal group planned attacks in Italy. "
– Brazilians, now what to do when the British refused to grant them Berezovsky? Also to expel diplomats? Britain herself with unusual grace elephant run up to the precedent. One gets the impression that inadequacy, asymmetric reaction is an end in itself, must stifle hysterical hearing on the merits. That's what we asserted: now British prosecutors unveil their irrefutable evidence, at least slightly open edge. Opened.
Q: In an interview, promptly appeared in "Sunday Telegraph", the barman of the hotel "Millennium", served the Litvinenko remembered unfriendly when one of the men barred from his table. It was at this point in the teapot sprayed polonium. According to the bartender, the remnants of tea in one of the dummies were more yellow color and unusual thick and sticky consistency. "
– Here is the delusion claiming the Nobel discovery of polonium on the influence of tea – this is all that the British themselves squeezed out. There is reason to believe that nothing is more convincing, they will not be able to squeeze out. But the possibility of diplomatic, political, propaganda tantrums are almost unlimited, or rather limited only by common sense, formerly visiting British politicians more often than it is today.
Q: One of the oldest members of the House of Lords, Bishop John Nichols Shefildsky formulated the basic principle of British policy towards Russia: "Pray on it for all to hear and pronounce the words in a whisper of criticism."
– What now remains? Just whisper to pray.