Against the background of spreading throughout the Arab East, especially the revolutionary fire as something ridiculous and confused sounding comments of official Washington.
"President Mubarak – our important ally in the Middle East. But in conversations with him, I have repeatedly stressed that Egypt is absolutely necessary political and economic reforms. And now the pent-up discontent burst into the streets," – said President Obama. As explained by Secretary Clinton, "we do not want this large, important country in the Middle East radical ideology prevailed. We want to establish real democracy there."
That is, we want to be queen of the sea, and the broken trough absolutely not acceptable. How did these guys ideologichny! Mikhail A. Suslov rest. In fact, when you have nothing to say, is to pronounce the ideological spell. By the way, is in some sense an alibi. The current administration – Obama is in any case, do with it. It is not he fanned the fire "on the mountain all bourgeois" in Egypt and Tunisia. However, when you incinerate the neighbors, do not be surprised that burned the entire village.
In the process of democratizing the Middle East, Americans almost destroyed the state of Afghanistan and Iraq, turning them into uncontrolled areas. Revived the civil conflict in Lebanon. Until now, vainly trying to destabilize Iran and Syria.
Now, Obama invokes on television that Egypt would win a real democracy, not angry Islamists. They even have to provide specially trained Democrat, served them right at the head of the IAEA.
Mohamed ElBaradei, has positioned itself as the leader of the democratic opposition, international official, the Egyptian career diplomat. For twelve years, until the end of 2009, he headed the International Atomic Energy Agency – IAEA dealing with nuclear disarmament of North Korea, Iraq and Iran. For that in 2005 earned the Nobel Peace Prize.
ElBaradei – symbolic figure for the current situation. Its for the Western public and absolutely a stranger to the Arab street. Professionally helpless, with the infinitely ambitious type, system reproduces the individual leaders of the flower revolutions. Man in principle not capable of retaining power in Egypt, under no external support. It's kind of right kind of trend in American manpower policy, "karlikizatsiya" You can tell their puppets.
By the way, it's amazing how the "true Islamists" and "real Zionists" today are absolutely convergent in the estimates of the same ElBaradei, in general, and political processes in the region. Because they both do not see any reason to deceive ourselves. True, one is encouraged, and other highly upsetting. The truth is that if a revolution – a revolution like it did – then the authority may retain only the radical Islamists. Only they can meet the Arab street.
A report prepared by the NATO Defense College, states: that "the most appropriate model for Egypt is Turkish." It is understood that in Turkey, which came to power, the Islamic Party, while preserving democracy and pro-Western orientation. According to NATO experts, and their sympathy for the Turkish model shares some "public opinion in the Arab world."
The fact of the matter is that no revolution in Turkey was not. It is through electoral manipulation can lead to power psevdoislamistov. Erdogan – a plaster cast of an Islamist in the NATO version. In a true revolution, not a flower, the authority may retain only the radicals: the Jacobins in France, the Bolsheviks in Russia, the Islamists in Egypt, as in Iran. But the radical Islamists – this is war. And not because they are evil. And because nothing but war, the Arab street that they can not give. That's the answer to the question of who want a great Arab revolution – the one who ordered the war.